|
GOW January 20-23, 2026
Trips to the Moon (Click images below to enlarge)
Sources:
www.ft.com/content/5adc069a-9d27-11e9-b8ce-8b459ed04726 www.statista.com/chart/18749/missions-to-the-moon-by-country/?srsltid=AfmBOoonG2H9P0MNCcsbs1O9_4jiC8F3m6aHQ5MdEaIcIXG24w20CraD www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2024/02/15/a-private-moon-mission-hopes-to-succeed-where-others-have-failed |
Get your students engaged! Here are some discussion openers to ask your class to get them thinking about the GOW this week: How many trips do you think our country has made to the moon? How many of these trips do you think were successful or not successful? What other countries have participated in the race to the moon? What risks are involved when travelling to the moon? Do you think the trips are worthwhile? Why or why not?
|
The Student
|
The New GOW: A 3-Part Analysis
For those of you who would like your students to engage in a deeper analysis of the GOW, this new format (2-sided) might be worth a try: Part A: Analysis (same as what GOW is now) Part B: What can you foresee happening in the near future? Part C: Based on your response in Part B, what solution(s) can you investigate or what other information/resources can you gather to strengthen your argument? I have found in recent years that some of my students want to share alternate perspectives to the information the graph portrays. They give historical context, present a counterargument by citing another source, or want to justify their stance based on personal experience or prior knowledge. I purposely left a bit of space after part C in case you may want students to make your own part D: you can have them create another graphical representation of their own, or make an illustration or cartoon, etc. So this year, I'm trying out this new 3-part written analysis that will give my students a platform in which they can share a bit more. I can't wait to see what they come up with! Click on the image below. |